Many things in a house are shared. The kitchen, for example, can be used by many people to store and prepare food. The utility room can be used by many people to wash and dry clothes. And the bathroom can be used by many people. Not at once, of course, but sequentially.
If you take the things in a house that can be shared, and share them, you will realize significant financial gains because you can take the same bill and divide it amongst several people. This allows everyone involved to not only live in a better, more equipped house, but to also save a lot of money in the process.
This article is all about the concept of shared housing. It begins with an overview of the primary benefits. Next is a definition of shared housing as well as a model of how it could work in the real world. And finally, there is a price comparison of what it would cost to live in a shared house versus a conventional single family dwelling.
Shared Housing Benefits
The benefits of shared housing are truly enormous. The more I think about this concept, the more benefits I realize. Just for starters, you have a tremendous financial benefit. By taking advantage of shared housing, you can easily lower your total monthly expenses by 50% or more. What does this mean, exactly?
Well, if you’re a regular full time worker paid by the hour, this means that you can work half as much. Instead of working full time, you could work part time. Take half the week off and go fishing, or whatever you enjoy doing in your spare time.
Alternatively, you can continue to work full time and spend the other half of your income on something else. Maybe that big screen television set you always wanted, or that new computer. Maybe that new car. Or maybe you can just put it into savings, or invest it. The possibilities are endless.
Besides the financial benefit, there are other benefits as well which some people argue are even more valuable. For example, there is the benefit of community and relationships. When a dozen people live in your house, you’ll always have someone to talk to. You’ll always have someone to play games with, someone that you can bounce ideas off of, and someone to hang out with. And they are right there, living in the same house as you. You don’t have to drive to another city, or call them on the phone.
Closely related to the benefit of relationships is the benefit of personal growth. When you’re around that many people, you’re bound to learn something new. Someone will stimulate you to grow to new heights, to understand new things, and to pursue new goals. Maybe the mechanic will show you how to work on your own car. Maybe the web developer will teach you how to make your own web site. Or maybe the crazed video gamer will keep you up on all the newest game releases. You never know what someone has to teach you until you go talk to them. Or, in this case, live with them.
Of course, there is also security and strength in numbers. If a dozen people live in a house, and they are all armed, I’m not sure how many criminals are going to want to mess around with that house. In fact, I bet criminals would be warning each other to stay away from the big house on the corner. It’s one thing to break into a house when only one person lives there. At worst, you may get shot at by one person. But with a dozen people? Well, at worst you’ll get shot at by a dozen people. At best, maybe six. Either way, you’re probably going to get shot at. This is a strong incentive for criminals to stay away.
And finally, you have the benefit of love and support from a lot of people. Some people may blow off this benefit. And that’s okay. But I know that the more people that you have supporting you in life, and looking out for you, the more likely you are to succeed. If you have a strong social network you are more likely to be happier, healthier, and to live longer. When you live with a lot of people, this automatically extends your social network by leaps and bounds.
Shared Housing Defined
Shared housing is defined here as a house that has sufficiently utilized assets and a sufficient division of responsibility amongst the house members. This means that the things in a house which can be shared, such as the kitchen, bathrooms, and living room, are shared among several people. These shared services, as I call them, get effectively utilized. This sharing of services is the primary reason that a shared house is more cost effective than a normal housing arrangement.
In a shared house there is also a division of responsibility and work. This could be in the form of monetary payments, or this could be in the form of physical labor. It is unfair, for everyone involved, to just have one person that carries all of the responsibility. If one person is doing all the work, this will rob everyone else of much needed personal growth, not to mention exercise.
Also, what would happen if the one working person decided to quit? Suddenly everyone else in the house is up the creek without a paddle.
So a shared housing arrangement must have two things. First, it must have shared housing services that are highly utilized, or shared, by several different people. This creates a very efficient house. And second, it must have a division of responsibility amongst the members. This makes the house very cost effective, for everyone involved.
A Shared Housing Model
The theory of shared housing is amazing. It has several incredible benefits and very few drawbacks. Because this model makes efficient use of housing resources, it is very cost effective and saves everyone a lot of money.
In the real world, however, there are things that must be considered to make this model work correctly. The main thing that must be considered is human relationships. The sad truth is that most adults, even though they may be well educated and knowledgeable, still haven’t learned how to get along with other people on a real level.
Sure, people can get along at work. They are getting paid to be there. If they don’t get along, then they might get fired. People also get along at church as well. They are expected to get along at church. Living together, however, is a whole different ball park. Just ask any couple who dated for a long time before moving in together. Things are different when you live with someone. People who used to get along just fine, suddenly don’t get along very well.
A shared housing model must account for other things as well, such as finances and our legal system. For example, as far as I know a single house can’t be owned by a dozen people. I’m not a lawyer, but I’ve never seen that many signature lines on a deed before.
In reality, of course, there are several different ways that someone could set up shared housing. There are several different ways to make this work. I am going to present one way that this model could work in real life.
First, the house itself would have to be pretty large. More specifically, there would have to be a lot of bedrooms and bathrooms in the house. In order to maximize the efficiency of the house, there should be at least three people per bathroom, six people per family/living room, and at least twelve people per kitchen. Since most houses only come with one kitchen and utility room, I would consider 16-24 people to be the maximum number of people in a shared housing arrangement.
The house would have to be legally owned by a person or couple. This person, or couple, would effectively be the head of the household and would ultimately be responsible for the shared housing arrangement. Decisions and dispute resolutions, however, should be decided upon by the house members in a democratic fashion. There should be a balance between the powers of the house members, and the power of the head of the household. Instead of decisions being made by the landlord, and then forced onto the tenants, they should be agreed upon by everyone in a democratic fashion and then carried out by the head of the household.
Financial responsibility should be shared amongst the members in the following manner. First, there should be a shared services charge for every person that lives there. This charge covers usage of all of the shared services in the house, such as the bathrooms, kitchen, utility room, water, electric, high speed Internet, and whatever other shared services are available. Next, there should be a charge for private quarters. For example, there would be a room charge for every room a family requires.
In this manner, what you get charged for is more aligned with what you actually make use of. If you are a couple sharing a bedroom, for example, you would get one room charge and two shared services charges on your bill. This would effectively give couples a discount because they only make use of one bedroom.
Everything that is outside of the bedroom, or private living quarters, would be considered a shared service and would be owned by the house. The living room, entertainment center, and furniture would all be part of the shared services. The kitchen and appliances would also be part of the shared services.
The cost of consumables for the house including food, toothpaste, toilet paper and whatnot, would be equally distributed amongst the shared services accounts. Everyone would have their own credit card that they can buy groceries for the house with, and everyone would be free to eat and consume whatever consumable goods are currently in the house at the time.
Part of the shared services charge would include a capital allocation account for house improvements and maintenance. This would be used to make improvements to the shared services such as buying a new entertainment center, installing an in ground pool, or building a new garage. These kinds of improvements would, in general, have to be agreed upon by the house members prior to purchase.
Instead of being stuck in a fixed contract, members would be free to leave or opt out whenever they want, without having to pay anything except what they owe. New members, however, would have to be interviewed and voted on by the existing house members before they were accepted.
A security deposit would be required upon entrance. In the event that someone moves out, this security deposit will be used to cover their last month’s expenses. Thus, in most cases, moving out of the house wouldn’t cost anything at all. You wouldn’t even have to pay your last bill, because it would be covered by the security deposit.
Other house chores, such as dishes and mowing the lawn, should also be shared amongst the members. Alternatively, they may be outsourced to other people, but this would also increase the shared services charge. In limited circumstances, physical labor and service may be exchanged as a form of payment. For example, if the water pipes burst while a plumber was living there, the head of the house may just contract out the repair work to the plumber. In exchange his shared services bill would be reduced or eliminated for the month.
A Cost Analysis For Shared Housing
Since the cost effectiveness of shared housing is likely the largest factor that most people are after, I’m going to present here a hypothetical comparison of the cost of living in a regular single family house versus using shared housing.
For the single family dwelling, this comparison uses what it would cost a couple to live in a standard 3 bedroom 2 bath house built on a slab. The price estimate for such a house was recently obtained from a local modular home builder. The quote for this house is $91,400 dollars.
For the shared house dwelling, this comparison uses what it would cost 11 couples to live in a higher quality two story house with a full finished basement. This home contains 11 bedrooms, 5 ½ baths, 2 large living rooms on the main floor and a huge family room(28′ x 28′) in the basement for recreational activities. It also contains a large kitchen, dining room, and utility room and includes all appliances. The price estimate for this home was obtained from the same modular home builder. The price estimate for the finished basement is based on a price estimate from a local general contractor. The entire quote for this house is $248,000.
In both cases, the monthly housing cost is based on a 30 year fixed rate mortgage payment. The interest rate for this mortgage is based on the rate from a local credit union, and is dependent on my personal credit history, employment record, and debt ratios. The utilities, property taxes, and home owner’s insurance are all based on local rates and conditions.
The cost basis is how much it would cost each individual to live in the home. It is calculated by taking the total cost and dividing it by the number of people paying for the bill. Here is the analysis:
|
|
Single Family |
Shared Family |
Single-Cost Basis |
Shared-Cost Basis |
|
Mortgage Payment |
$733.00 |
$1,832.00 |
$366.50 |
$83.27 |
|
Electric |
$130.00 |
$280.00 |
$65.00 |
$12.72 |
|
Cable,Phone,Internet |
$120.00 |
$120.00 |
$60.00 |
$5.46 |
|
Water,Trash,Sewer |
$60.00 |
$90.00 |
$30.00 |
$4.09 |
|
Totals: |
$1,043.00 |
$2,322.00 |
$521.50 |
$105.54 |
As you can see, in this situation it costs five times more per person to live in a standard single family dwelling than it does to live in a shared house. This is absolutely amazing.
Conclusion
You can see the benefits. You can see the analysis. So why is it that few people take this approach in America? Well, it’s not normal. People don’t get along. Many people would just rather live alone. And they, quite literally, pay the price for doing so.
Think about this approach for a while. Do you agree that it would save you and/or your family a tremendous amount of money? Do you agree that it would expand your social circle? Do you agree that it would encourage you to grow and interact with more people?
What’s stopping you?
I can honestly say that the only thing that has stopped me from doing this so far has been a lack of people who can work, who can get along, and who can accept one another. Most people, I have found, don’t even have the willingness to read an article like this, let alone try this out.
So if you’re someone who has actually read this article, and you comprehend it, shoot me an email.
Maybe we can move in together.